The federal government will pay another $475 million to compensate people affected by the Robodebt scheme. This represents the biggest class action settlement ever recorded in Australia and will help more than 450000 people who were incorrectly chased by Centrelink for debts they never actually owed. The settlement comes after years of legal battles over the controversial automated debt recovery system. The government had already paid $751 million in refunds & interest to victims before this new compensation package was announced. Robodebt was an automated system that calculated welfare debts by averaging income data from the Australian Taxation Office across a full year. The system then matched this information against fortnightly Centrelink payments. This method was fundamentally flawed because it assumed people earned the same amount every fortnight throughout the year. Many Australians received debt notices demanding repayment of thousands of dollars. The system targeted some of the most vulnerable members of society including students and casual workers whose incomes naturally varied throughout the year. People were often left confused and distressed when they received these unexpected demands for money. The scheme operated between 2015 and 2019 before being shut down after mounting criticism and legal challenges. A royal commission later found the program was unlawful & caused significant harm to many Australians. The inquiry revealed that senior public servants and ministers knew about serious problems with the scheme but allowed it to continue anyway. This additional compensation payment acknowledges the stress and anxiety that victims experienced when dealing with the illegal debt recovery system. The money will be distributed among eligible class action members who can prove they suffered harm beyond just the financial impact of the incorrect debts.
The Robodebt Scheme and Its Impact
The Australian government operated an automated system called Robodebt that incorrectly claimed welfare recipients owed money they did not actually owe. This new settlement follows an earlier agreement from 2020 that many people felt was poorly managed. The government will now pay $548.5 million in total to resolve the matter. This amount covers the money owed to affected people as well as legal fees up to $13.5 million & administrative expenses up to $60 million. The Federal Court still needs to approve this settlement before it becomes final.
Legal Firm Gordon Legal’s Statement
Law firm Gordon Legal confirmed that more than 450000 people will benefit from the settlement. Peter Gordon who founded Gordon Legal said this settlement was a vindication and validation for those affected by the Robodebt scandal. He emphasized that this settlement proves Australia is a nation governed by law where even the government is held accountable.
Goodbye to Modest Support: New Year Centrelink Boost From 18 February 2026 Lifts Payments by $1,200
Felicity Button’s Personal Account
Felicity Button was a former nursing student who joined the class action. She talked about the unfair debt she faced of $11500 while she was receiving Youth Allowance. Button said that Robodebt caused deep trauma that hurt families and led to bankruptcies & serious mental health problems. She believed the settlement was as just and fair as it could be. Button pointed out that the harm to victims would last a long time and could never be fully repaid.
Government’s Commitment to Addressing the Issue
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the government wanted to fix the damage done to vulnerable Australians by the previous Liberal government’s failed Robodebt scheme. She explained that settling the claim was the right and fair decision to make.
The Robodebt Scheme Under the Coalition Government
The Robodebt scheme ran from 2015 to 2019 under the Coalition government. The program went after welfare recipients to collect debts they never actually owed. This caused terrible outcomes for many people and contributed to the suicides of at least two Australians. A Royal Commission called the scheme a crude and cruel mechanism that was neither fair nor legal. The investigation also discovered that people suffered trauma from the constant worry that they might owe money even though there was no evidence to back up these claims.
